Loading...
Mob rule: On migrants, rising hate crimes in India
In the closing weeks of 2025, a series of violent incidents across India exposed a disturbing pattern of mob violence directed at migrants who were labelled foreigners — Bangladeshis and Chinese — by their attackers. In these cases, the three victims were Indian citizens from various parts of the country. Suspicion based on language, region, appearance or presumed nationality is escalating into mob violence in different regions. This is extremely worrying and the police must act strictly. The political leadership in States and the Centre must make it clear that such violence is unacceptable. In Palakkad district, Kerala, Ram Narayan Baghel, a 31-year-old migrant worker from Chhattisgarh was lynched by a mob on December 17. Baghel was accused of theft and repeatedly questioned about his identity, with his attackers allegedly asking him whether he was “Bangladeshi” before beating him to death. Kerala is heavily dependent on migrant labour, and prides itself on its high levels of education and law and order. The lynching is a blot on its reputation. On December 24, in Sambalpur in Odisha, a young migrant worker from West Bengal was beaten to death by a mob that accused him of being a “Bangladeshi”. Juel Sheikh, a daily wage labourer, was confronted at a tea stall by unidentified persons who demanded his identity documents and accused him of being an illegal Bangladeshi immigrant. Two days later, in another incident from Odisha, a Bengali-speaking street vendor from West Bengal was assaulted.
In Tamil Nadu, a man from Odisha was attacked while travelling on a train, in Tiruvallur district, by juveniles armed with machetes and sickles. The assault was filmed and circulated on social media. In Dehradun, on December 28, Anjel Chakma, a 22-year-old student from Tripura, was stabbed by a group that had allegedly hurled racial slurs at him and his brother. He died in hospital later. People from the northeastern States are often treated as perpetual outsiders in other parts of India; Chakma was called “Chinese” by his attackers. These are not isolated incidents: they occur amid numerous other cases of mob intimidation, sometimes targeting worshippers of minority communities, at other times, even young students celebrating a friend’s birthday. The police in the States have responded to these horrible crimes by making some arrests, but that is not sufficient. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has turned its incendiary campaign against “illegal infiltration” from Bangladesh as a central plank in the forthcoming Assembly elections in Assam and West Bengal. It is no coincidence that mobs across the country feel emboldened to raise this bogey at random against helpless people. The BJP should realise the dangers of its campaign and restrain itself.
Overall Analysis
The editorial strongly condemns the recent spate of mob violence against migrant workers and students who are falsely labelled as “foreigners” based on language, appearance, or regional identity. It opens with a factual recounting of multiple lynchings and assaults across different States, establishing that these are not isolated incidents but part of a disturbing national pattern. The language is direct and alarming, meant to jolt the reader into recognising the gravity of the situation.
By detailing individual cases — from Kerala, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, and Uttarakhand — the editorial humanises the issue and shows how suspicion rooted in prejudice has escalated into deadly violence. Words such as “lynched,” “beaten to death,” and “stabbed” are deliberately stark, underscoring the brutality involved. The author also contrasts these crimes with the reputations of States like Kerala, thereby highlighting the moral and institutional failure behind such incidents.
The analysis then moves beyond description to accountability. It criticises law enforcement responses as inadequate and stresses that mere arrests after the fact do not address the climate of fear and impunity. The editorial links this violence to political rhetoric, arguing that the BJP’s aggressive campaign against “illegal infiltration” has normalised suspicion and emboldened mobs. The phrase “it is no coincidence” clearly signals the author’s belief in a causal relationship between incendiary political language and street-level violence.
Overall, the editorial combines reportage with moral and political critique, warning that unchecked hate crimes threaten social cohesion and constitutional values. The author’s language is firm, morally charged, and urgent, reflecting the seriousness of mob rule replacing the rule of law.
Important Vocabulary (5)
- Lynched – killed by a mob without legal process.
- Incendiary – deliberately provocative or inflammatory.
- Embodied / Emboldened – given confidence or encouragement to act aggressively.
- Bogey – an exaggerated or false threat used to create fear.
- Perpetual – continuing indefinitely; never-ending.
Conclusion & Tone
The editorial concludes that rising hate crimes against migrants represent a failure of governance, policing, and political responsibility. It urges political leaders, especially the ruling party, to restrain divisive rhetoric and reaffirm that mob violence has no place in a constitutional democracy.
Tone: Grave, critical, and morally urgent.
